Talk:Individualized medicine
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Original research tag
[edit]I haven't rigorously verified every claim in the article, so it's possible there's more than one issue, but in particular I want to draw attention to the assertion that individualized medicine has become a new field of research followed by citations to ten-odd papers. While this claim may very well be true, citing a bunch of novel studies (essentially primary sources in this context) is not the way to back up such a claim. Rather, we should only make claims like this when we can source the claim directly to a source. signed, Rosguill talk 22:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)